BONDED WEARING COURSE (BWC)
PART 1 GENERAL
1.1SECTION INCLUDES
1.2RELATED SECTIONS
1.3REFERENCES
Aggregates by Washing
Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact the Los Angeles Machine
Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) – 1 of 16
Magnesium Sulfate
the Sand Equivalent Test
Tester
Wheel
Induced Damage
a Ductilometer
Uncompacted Asphalt Mixtures
Mixture Specimens by Means of the Superpave Gyratory Compactor
Abrasion in the Micro-Deval Apparatus
Smectite Group in Aggregates Using Methylene Blue
Aggregate
Rate of Bituminous Distributors
Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) – 2 of 16
1.4DEFINITIONS
treatment consisting of a warm Polymer-Modified Emulsion Membrane and an ultra-thin, gap-graded asphalt mix overlay. It is typically less than 1 inch thick. The asphalt mix surface course is placed immediately on the emulsion. A BWC is a homogeneous wearing surface and pavement seal that can be opened to traffic immediately after cooling.
emulsion applied to the pavement to seal the underlying pavement and provide a strong bond to the surface course.
1.5SUBMITTALS
showing the target values of percent passing on all sieves listed in Table 9.
quality control data for the target selection.
asphalt binder film thickness.
requirements of Table 8.
final pavement.
1.6ACCEPTANCE
determined per lot according to Table 1 using the single test result with the largest deviation from the target. Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) – 3 of 16
per lot according to the Percent within Limits (PT) computation using Table 2, 3, 4, and 5.
eligible for any incentive.
necessary.
for each lot is determined according to Table 6.
production day.
the specific gravity reported on the bill of lading to convert from tons to gallons.
01456.
whichever is greater, will be assessed.
Table 1 Incentive/Disincentive Pay Adjustment Binder Content (Dollars per yd2 of BWC) Within ± 0.30% of target 0.05 Between ± 0.31% and ± 0.45% of 0.00 target Between ± 0.46% ± 0.60% of -0.10 target Greater than ± 0.61% Reject
Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) – 4 of 16
Table 2 Gradation Upper and Lower Limit Determination Parameter UL and LL ½ inch sieve for BWC Type C Target Value ± 6.0 percent /8 inch sieve for BWC Type B # 4 sieve Target Value ± 6.0 percent # 8 sieve Target Value ± 5.0 percent # 50 sieve Target Value ± 3.0 percent # 200 sieve Target Value ± 2.0 percent
Table 3 Incentive/Disincentive for Gradation PT Pay Adjustment Based on Min. Four Samples (dollars per yd2 of BWC) > 99 0.06 96-99 0.04 92-95 0.02 88-91 0.00 84-87 -0.01 80-83 -0.02 76-79 -0.04 72-75 -0.05 68-71 -0.06 64-67 -0.07 60-63 -0.09 <60 Reject
Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) – 5 of 16
Table 4 Quality Index Values (QU or QL) for Estimating Percent Within Limits PU or n=3 n=4 n=5 n=6 n=7 n=8 n=10 n=12 n=15 n=20 PL 100 1.16 1.50 1.75 1.91 2.06 2.15 2.29 2.35 2.47 2.56 99 1.16 1.47 1.68 1.79 1.89 1.95 2.04 2.09 2.14 2.19 98 1.15 1.44 1.61 1.70 1.77 1.80 1.86 1.89 1.93 1.97 97 1.15 1.41 1.55 1.62 1.67 1.69 1.74 1.77 1.80 1.82 96 1.15 1.38 1.49 1.55 1.59 1.61 1.64 1.66 1.69 1.70 95 1.14 1.35 1.45 1.49 1.52 1.54 1.56 1.57 1.59 1.61 94 1.13 1.32 1.40 1.44 1.46 1.47 1.49 1.50 1.51 1.53 93 1.12 1.29 1.36 1.38 1.40 1.41 1.43 1.43 1.44 1.46 92 1.11 1.26 1.31 1.33 1.35 1.36 1.37 1.37 1.38 1.39 91 1.10 1.23 1.27 1.29 1.30 1.31 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.33 90 1.09 1.20 1.23 1.24 1.25 1.25 1.26 1.26 1.27 1.27 89 1.08 1.17 1.20 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.22 1.22 88 1.07 1.14 1.16 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 87 1.06 1.11 1.12. 1.12 1.12 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 86 1.05 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 85 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 84 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 83 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 82 0.98 0.96 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 81 0.96 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.90 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.88 80 0.94 0.90 0.88 0.87 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 79 0.92 0.87 0.85 0.84 0.83 0.83 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.81 78 0.89 0.84 0.82 0.81 0.80 0.79 0.79 0.78 0.78 0.78 77 0.87 0.81 0.79 .0.78 0.77 0.76 0.76 0.75 0.75 0.75 76 0.84 0.78 0.76 0.75 0.74 0.73 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 75 0.82 0.75 0.73 0.72 0.71 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.68 74 0.79 0.72 0.70 0.68 0.67 0.67 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.65 73 0.77 0.69 0.67 0.65 0.64 0.64 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 72 0.74 0.66 0.64 0.62 0.61 0.61 0.60 0.59 0.59 0.59 71 0.71 0.63 0.60 0.59 0.58 0.58 0.57 0.56 0.56 0.56 70 0.68 0.60 0.58 0.56 0.55 0.55 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.53 69 0.65 0.57 0.55 0.54 0.53 0.52 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.50 68 0.62 0.54 0.52 0.51 0.50 0.50 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 67 0.59 0.51 0.49 0.48 0.47 0.47 0.46 0.45 0.45 0.45 66 0.56 0.48 0.46 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.43 0.42 0.42 0.42 65 0.53 0.45 0.43 0.42 0.41 0.41 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.39 64 0.49 0.42 0.40 0.39 0.38 0.38 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 63 0.46 0.39 0.37 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.34 0.34 0.34 62 0.43 0.36 0.34 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.32 0.31 0.31 0.31 61 0.39 0.33 0.31 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.28 60 0.36 0.30 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.26 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 <60 ≤0.35 ≤0.29 ≤0.27 ≤0.26 ≤0.25 ≤0.25 ≤0.24 ≤0.24 ≤0.24 ≤0.24 Enter table in the appropriate sample size column and round down to the nearest value. Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) – 6 of 16
Table 5 Definitions, Abbreviations, and Formulas for Acceptance Term Explanation Target Value (TV) The target values for gradation and asphalt binder content are given in the Contractor’s volumetric mix design. Average (AVE) The sum of the lot’s test results for a measured characteristic divided by the number of test results, the arithmetic mean. Standard Deviation (s) The square root of the value formed by summing the squared difference between the individual test results of a measured characteristic and AVE divided by the number of test results minus one. This statement does not limit the methods of calculations of s. Other methods that obtain the same value may be used. Upper Limit (UL) The value above the TV of each measured characteristic that defines the upper limit of acceptable production. (Table 2) Lower Limit (LL) The value below the TV of each measured characteristic that defines the lower limit of acceptable production (Table 2) Upper Quality Index QU = (UL - AVE)/s (QU) Lower Quality Index (QL) QL = (AVE - LL)/s Percentage of Lot Within Determined by entering Table 4 with QU UL (PU) Percentage of Lot Within Determined by entering Table 4 with QL LL (PL) Total Percentage of Lot PT = (PU + PL) – 100
(PT) Incentive/Disincentive Determined by entering Table 1 and 3 with PT or PL. Calculate all values for AVE, s, QU, and QL to two decimal place accuracy and carried through all further calculations. Rounding to lower accuracy is not allowed.
Table 6 PMEM Pay Adjustment Actual Field PMEM Rate Pay Adjustment (Gallons/Square Yard) (dollars per yd2 of BWC) Within Specified Rate ±0.03 0 Within Specified Rate ± 0.03 to ± 0.06 -2.00 Not Within Specified Rate ± 0.06 Remove and Replace
Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) – 7 of 16
PART 2 PRODUCTS
2.1ASPHALT BINDER
02742S.
2.2POLYMER MODIFIED EMULSION MEMBRANE (PMEM)
requirements, including the application rate and design thickness.
Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) – 8 of 16
Table 7 Polymer Modified Emulsion Membrane (a) Tests AASHTO Min. Max. Test Method Emulsion Viscosity, SFS, 122º F (50º C), sec T 59 20 100 Storage Stability Test, 1 d, 24 h, percent T 59 1 Sieve Test (b), percent T 59 0.1 Demulsibility, % 35 ml 0.8% sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate T 59 40 Distillation Oil Distillate, by volume of emulsion, percent 2 Residue (c), percent 63 Residue from Distillation Test Penetration, 77° F (25° C), 100 g, 5s, dmm T 49 60 150 Elastic Recovery (d), percent T 301 55 Solubility Solubility in Organic Solvent, percent T 44 97.5
separation, pumpable and suitable for application through spray bars after standing undisturbed for 24 hours. Modify before emulsification.
achieved in the field.
(177 ± 3° C) maximum temperature to be held for a period of 15 minutes.
two seconds, sever the specimen at its center with a pair of scissors after 20 cm has been reached.
2.3HYDRATED LIME
2.4AGGREGATE MATERIALS
gravel, or slag.
Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) – 9 of 16
Table 8 Aggregate Properties Properties Test Method Test Requirement One Fractured Face AASHTO T 335 95% min. Two Fractured Face AASHTO T 335 90% min. Fine Aggregate Angularity AASHTO T 304 45% min. Flakiness Index UDOT MOI 933 17% max. (Based on ⅜ inch sieve and above) L.A. Wear AASHTO T 96 30% max. Micro-Deval Loss AASHTO T 327 18% max. loss Sand Equivalent AASHTO T 176 60 min. Plasticity Index AASHTO T 89 and T 90 0 Polish Test AASHTO T 278 and T 279 31 min. Soundness (sodium sulfate) AASHTO T 104 12% max. loss with five cycles Clay Lumps and Friable AASHTO T 112 2% max. Particles Natural Fines None None Methylene Blue AASHTO T 330 10% max.
Table 9 Aggregate Gradation Percent Passing by Dry Weight of Aggregate AASHTO T 11, T 27 Percent Sieve Size Type A Type B Type C ¾ inch 100 100 100 ½ inch 100 100 75 - 100 ⅜ inch 100 75 - 100 55 - 80 #4 40 - 55 22 - 38 22 - 38 #8 22 - 32 19 - 32 19 - 32 #16 15 - 25 15 - 25 15 - 25 #30 10 - 18 10 - 18 10 - 18 #50 8 - 13 8 - 13 8 - 13 #100 6 - 10 6 - 10 6 - 10 # 200 4-7 4-7 4-7
Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) – 10 of 16
2.5JOB MIX DESIGN
mixture.
effective binder content and aggregate surface area calculated according to Asphalt Institute MS-2 Table 6.1.
when tested according to AASHTO T 305.
AASHTO T 283 with the following modifications:
sources.
gyrations.
2.5 ± 0.05 inch high.
achieved after 30 gyrations.
proceed without calculating percent saturation.
Laboratory (AMRL) for all testing.
Design.
2.6EQUIPMENT
and authorized by the Engineer with the following characteristics:
tank, system for measuring the PMEM volume applied, spray bar, and a heated, variable-width screed.
overlay, and leveling the surface of the mat in one pass.
Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) – 11 of 16
the application of the PMEM.
per minute. 1) Make no contact between the wheel or other part of the paving machine and the PMEM before applying the asphalt mix.
a minimum capacity of 7 tons and a mass flow design to deliver remixed BWC directly to the paver conveyor system.
pavement at the center and have vertically adjusted extensions to accommodate the desired pavement profile.
characteristics:
minimize temperature segregation, and deliver a uniform BWC to the paver.
the haul units.
paver start/stops and maximize trucking efficiency.
1) Able to swing to either side to allow off-lane paving.
1) Equipped with a hopper insert with a minimum capacity of 7 tons. 2) Hopper insert with mass flow design to deliver remixed BWC directly to the paver conveyor system.
tons.
system and scrapers to prevent adhesion of the fresh mix onto the roller drums.
accomplished promptly following the placement of the material.
Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) – 12 of 16
PART 3 EXECUTION
3.1PRE-PAVING MEETING
process to discuss methods of accomplishing all phases of the work. Arrange for the following people to attend:
3.2MIXING
all particles are coated.
3.3EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION
ASTM D 2995 or an approved method by the Engineer before start of BWC production.
placements of BWC material.
the specified application rates, and do not vary more than 20 percent between right and left side pads.
in the presence of the Engineer.
spray paving equipment.
3.4SURFACE PREPARATION
utility structures with plastic or building felt before paving.
above the existing pavement. Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) – 13 of 16
BWC.
material, giving specific attention to accumulated mud and debris.
clean surface.
3.5BWC PLACEMENT
without contacting the pavement.
temperature of 120 to 180 degrees F at the specified application rate.
when paving next to a vertical edge to guarantee proper application of the PMEM.
surface to be paved.
the full width of the PMEM application with a heated screed.
to seat without fracturing mix aggregate.
prevent adhesion of the fresh mix to the roller drum and wheels.
material.
lane, but never in a wheel path.
than 30 minutes.
Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) – 14 of 16
with BWC have straight, uniform, longitudinal lines, and neat vertical edges to guarantee surface is neat in appearance after through lanes are paved.
PMEM.
following:
3.6LIMITATIONS
in the shade and the pavement surface temperature are above 60 degrees F.
the pavement structure.
weather conditions.
complete and the material has cooled below 185 degrees F. Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) – 15 of 16
3.7LABORATORY CORRELATION
quality control testing using Department LQP qualified lab.
and tests related to volumetric properties.
of Instruction, Appendix C.
days meet α = 0.05 for a two tailed distribution.
days.
days of the first five days cannot be met.
production continues indicating the changes in procedures that will be implemented to correct the deficiencies. 1) Both Contractor and Department labs must make paired t test results available within 24 hours of sampling.
END OF SECTION
Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) – 16 of 16
Get an email when 02787 changes
Utah revises spec sections through supplementals and new editions. We check this one every week and email you the day it changes. Free, no account.