A.General. The bid item list specifies the unit of measure for each contract item. The Engineer will measure accepted quantities of work for each contract item in accordance with the “Method of Measurement” subsection in the relevant specifications and Section 109.01, “Measurement of Quantities.” In the case of a conflict, the method of measurement in the relevant specifications supersedes the method of measurement in Section 109.01, “Measurement of Quantities.” Unless the contract spec ifies payment by plan quantity, the Engineer will measure the actual quantity of accepted work for each contract item.
E.Volume. For volume calculations of contract items, the Engineer will use the avera ge end-area method, the prismoidal method, truck/vehicle method, or other acceptable methods.
J.Material Weight.
1.General. Weigh materials on a certified scale. Provide a scale operator to operate the scale, issue weigh tickets, perform scale verifications, and prepare tare weight reports and daily haul summaries. Do not supply tickets, as specified in Section 109.01 J.6.a “General” , to truck drivers if the weight of the load is in excess of the legal load limits in place on the haul route. Provide scales that are:
a.Certified by a scale service company registered with the North Dakota Public Service Commission. If the certification is more than 9 months old when the scale begins project use, have the scale recertified. Submit a copy of the certification before starting weighing operations.
b.Accurate to within 1.0 percent of the true weight of the applied load throughout the range of use.
2.Scale Applications. Use either computerized or non -computerized scales to determine weights for material when the quantity of the material included in the bid item list is 2,000 tons or less.
a.Computerized Scales. Use a computerized scale to determine the weight of material when the quantity included on the bid item list is greater than 2,000 tons . Use a scale with a digital readout and a computer that produces weigh tickets and daily haul summaries.
b.Computerized Loader Bucket Scales. Loader bucket scales may be used to weigh materials when the quantity of material included in the bid item list is less than 10,000 tons and for aggregates specified under Sections 420 “Bituminous Seal Coat” , 421 “Microsurfacing” , and 422 “Slurry Seal” regardless of quantity. Equip loader bucket scales with an onboard computer that produces weigh tickets. Load trucks on a level loading area and with the loader scale in dynamic mode. Operate the loader scale in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines.
3.Types of Scales.
a.Platform Scales. Provide scales with a platform that is large enough to simultaneously weigh all axles of the longest truck, or truck -trailer combination, used for the project. Determine the daily tare weight of each truck before it hauls its first load. Ensure trucks are fully fueled at the time the tare weight is determined. Before the first use of the scale for the project and any time the scale is recertified, perform the: − zero load test; − comparison test; − sensitivity test; and − shift test.
b.Hopper or Batch Scale. Provide hopper and batch scales that use one or more load cells. Before the first use of the scale for the project and any time the scale is recertified, perform the: − zero load test; − comparison test; and − sensitivity test.
c.Computerized Loader Bucket Scale. Before the first use of loader bucket scales for the projec t and any time the scale is recertified, perform the comparison test.
4.Verification Tests. The Engineer will verify the accuracy of scales by observing the Contractor perform the verification tests specified in Section 109.01 J.3 “Types of Scales” . The Engineer may request verification tests to be performed randomly. If the scale is not operating within the required tolerance, have the scale recertified by a scale service company registered with the North Dakota Public Service Commission.
a.Zero Load Test. Adjust the scale so that it balances or reads “zero” when no load is applied to the scale.
b.Comparison Test. If the difference between the weight determined by the scale and the comparison test is more than 1.0 percent, repair and recertify the project scale.
1.Platform Scales. Perform a comparison test using one of the following methods. Notify the Engineer of the method that will be used before starting weighing operations. Obtain the Engineer’s permission if a change in test methods is desired.
a.Independent Scale Method. The Engineer will randomly select a loaded truck that has been weighed on the project scale. The Contractor shall weigh this truck on a certified scale owned and operated by an entity other than the Contractor.
b.Certified Equipment Weight Method. Weigh a piece of equipment on the project scale. Use a piece of equipment that: − is fully fueled; 99 − is free of mud and dirt; and − has a certified weight of a least 60 percent of the maximum load to be applied to the scale during the life of the contract. Provide an affidavit affirming the certified weight of the equipment. Provide a new affidavit when any changes are made to the equipment that will affec t the certified weight. If using the certified equipment weight method, perform a secondary check using the independent scale method for the first two days that the scale is in operation and once per month thereafter.
2.Hopper or Batch Scales. After the material has been weighed on the project scale and placed in a truck, weigh the loaded truck on a certified scale owned and operated by an entity other than the Contractor. Provide the tare weight of the truck along with the comparison weigh tick et.
3.Computerized Loader Bucket Scales. Perform a comparison test using one of the following methods:
a.Independent Scale Method. After placing the load in a truck, weigh the loaded truck on a certified scale owned and operated by an entity other than the Contractor. Provide the tare weight of the truck along with the comparison weigh ticket.
b.Certified Weighted Object Method. Weigh an object on the project scale and compare its certified weight to the loader bucket scale readout. Use an object that: − is free of mud and dirt; and − has a certified weight of at least 60 percent of the capacity of the loader bucket. Weld a plate onto the object showing its certified weight. Provide an affidavit affirming the weight of the object, as measured on a certified scale. Provide a new affidavit when requested by the Engineer or if changes are made to the object that will affect the certified weight.
c.Sensitivity Test. Weigh a representative load and then add 100 pounds of test weights. If the scale is not sensitive to the added weight, repair and recertify the scale.
d.Shift Test. Check the performance of the scale with off-center loading by comparing the results of weighing a truck in the following positions: − Place the rear wheels at the extreme end of the scale platform; 100 − Position the truck with the rear wheels at the extreme opposite end of the platform; and − Position the truck in the center of the platform. Repair and recertify the scale if the results of any two positions differ by more than 0.2 percent.
5.Random Comparison Tests. If a comparison test reveals that the scale is out of tolerance, repair and recertify the scale. At any time, the Engineer may require the scale to be checked for accuracy utilizing any test method.
a.Platform Scales. Perform a comparison test as specified in Section 109.01 J.4.b.(1) “Platform Scales”. Conduct one test for each 5,000 tons of material weighed, except when more than 5,000 tons are weighed in one day. When more than 5,000 tons of material is weighed in one day, conduct one test for that day’s production.
b.Batch and Hopper Scales. Perform a comparison test as specified in Scales”. Conduct one test for each 5,000 tons of material weighed, except when more than 5,000 tons are weighed in one day. When more than 5,000 tons of material is weighed in one day, conduct one test for that day’s production.
c.Computerized Loader B ucket Scales. Perform a comparison test as specified in Loader Bucket Scales”. Perform a comparison test each day that the loader bucket scale is used. Record the results of the test and submit a signed copy to the Engineer. The Engineer may prohibit the use of loader bucket scales if two consecutive tests fail.
6.Documentation.
a.General. Place a unique identification number on each truck that is legible and in plain view of the scale operator. Document the weight of each load on a separate, sequentially numbered weigh ticket that has a maximum size of 5.5 × 8.5 inches. Provide one copy to the driver of the truck. The truck driver shall deliver the weigh ticket to the Engineer at the location where the material is incorporated into the work. The Engineer will reject loads that are not accompanied by a legible weigh ticket.
1.Computerized Scales. Produce computer generated weigh tickets. Produce computer generated daily haul summaries using the same computer, software, and data that produced the 101 individual weigh tickets. Submit paper haul summaries and daily tare weight reports at the beginning of the subsequent work day. Notify the Engineer if the computer or printer malfunctions. If this occurs, non- computerized weighing and recording will be allowed for a maximum of 2 consecutive work days.
2.Computerized Loader Bucket Scales. Generate weigh tickets using the onboard computer and loader bucket scale printer. Produce daily haul summaries by hand or a computer generated spreadsheet.
3.Non-Computerized Scales. The scale operator shall generate weigh tickets when non-computerized scales are used. Produce daily haul summaries by hand or a computer generated spreadsheet.
b.Trucks and Weigh Tickets. Place the following information on each weigh ticket:
2.NDDOT project number or NDDOT Project Control Number (PCN)
4.Contractor and Subcontractor if applicable
6.Identification number of truck
7.Material type identified by pay item name
9.Weight delivered: − Gross weight, tare weight and net weight for platform scales − Net Weight for batch, hopper, and loader bucket scales
10.Scale person’s signature for manually produced tickets
c.Daily Haul Summaries. For each material weighed, provide a haul summary containing the following information:
1.NDDOT project number or NDDOT PCN (whichever is used on the weigh tickets)
3.Contractor and Subcontractor if applicable
5.Identification number of truck
6.Each load’s net weight and ticket number, with justification for out of sequence numbers
7.Material type identified by pay item name
8.Total weight of material delivered to the project
9.Weight of material voided for the day
10.Weight of the day’s production
11.A signed statement from the Contractor attesting to the accuracy and completeness of the facts represented. A signed statement from a subcontractor or supplier attesting to the accuracy and completeness of the facts represented is 102 required if they operate the scales. The statement shall consist of the following language: “I certify the Daily Haul Summary is true, accurate, and complete.”
12.Blank for the Engineer’s signature. Include the following language: “I certify the Daily Haul Summary has been reviewed, corrected as necessary, and approved.”
7.Basis of Payment. If a comparison test reveals a scale is overweighing, the Engineer will adjust the payment for all material weighed since the last accepted test under Comparison Tests” . The Engineer will calculate the weight of all materials weighed after the last accepted test and reduce the payment for this material by the percentage of scal e error exceeding 1.0 percent. The Department will not compensate the Contractor for losses due to a scale under -weighing material. The Department will pay for materials on the basis of daily haul summaries produced by the Contractor and approved by the E ngineer. If daily haul summaries are not generated using the same computer, software and data that produced the individual weigh tickets, the Department will pay based on individual weigh tickets. Include the cost of operating scales in the contract unit price of the items being weighed.
K.Weight -Volume Conversion. The Contractor may request to weigh material specified to be measured by volume. If the Engineer approves the request, the Engineer will convert the material weight to a volume quantity for payment. Material will be weighed as specified in Weight”. The Contractor may request to have material specified to be measured by weight, measured by volume. If the Engineer approves the request, the Engineer will convert the material volume to weight for payment. The Engineer will determine a material’s conversion factors for weight to volume and for volume to weight based on the materials’ specific gravity or density. Before the Engineer uses the conversion factors, the Engineer and Contractor shall agree in writing to the factors.
L.Bituminous Material.
1.General. The Engineer will measure bitumen by the ton or gallon. The Engineer may convert the weight of bitumen to volume or the volume of bitumen to weight based on conversion factors determined from the specific gravity of the bitumen. If measuring bitumen by volume, the Engineer will adjust the measured volume to the equivalent volume at 60°F, using the tables in ASTM D 4311. The Engineer will measure or verify the quantity of bitumen at the point of delivery. The Engineer will deduct the quantity of bitumen not placed on the road surface from the delivered quantity. The Engineer may weigh any load of bitumen at the point of delivery to the project site.
2.Weighing of Bituminous Material. For bitumen weighed at the source, provide a legible shipment manifest with each sealed tank, signed by a supplier representative. For bitumen transported directly from the source to the project site in a distributor or transport truck and trailer, weigh each vehicle using one of the following methods: − Before and after loading, on scales provided by the supplier or on public scales near the source; or − Before and after unloading, on the Contractor’s scales or on public scales near the project site. Use a scale with current certification from the state agency with the appropriate jurisdiction in the state the scale is located.
3.Acceptance of Material. If the Engineer determines that the bitumen materially affects the quality of the work, to the extent that the contract requires corrective action or removal, the Department will not pay for the bitumen or any affected related items. If both the original and check samples of bitumen fail to meet the same testing requirement of the relevant specific ations and the material remains in the transport vehicles, the Engineer will reject the entire load of bitumen. If both the original and check samples fail to meet the same testing requirement of the relevant specifications and the material is no longer i n the transport vehicle, the Engineer will determine a contract price adjustment as specified in Price Adjustments”. The Department will pay the contract unit price for accepted quantities of bitumen measured, when the Engineer conditionally accepts the material for use and one of the following conditions exists: − The original sample of the bitumen meets all testing requirements of the relevant specifications; or − The original sample of the bitumen does not meet all testing requirements of the relevant specifications, but the check sample meets the testing requirements not met by the original.
4.Contract Price Adjustments.
a.Performance Graded (PG) Asphalts.
1.General. The Department defines price adjustments for PG Asphalt binders using the Multiply Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Test under AASHTO M332.
2.Sampling. Obtain one sample of asphalt binder for each 250 tons of binder material supplied to the project. Obtain the sample as prescribed in the NDDOT Field Sampling and Testing Manual, Procedure NDDOT 1. Each 250 tons of material 104 will represent a sublot and 4 sublots will constitute a lot of material. Partial lots will consist of however many sublot samples were collected for that lot.
3.Originals and Check Samples. Each sample consists of two parts, an original and a check. The Engineer will perform tests using the original sample first. If a test returns a value resulting in a pay factor of less than 1.00, the Engi neer will perform that test on the check sample and the check sample results will be used to determine the pay factor for the material.
4.Testing Parameters. The Engineer will randomly select one sublot for testing per lot. If the check sample results in a pay factor of less than 1.00, the Engineer will perform the substandard tests on the remaining sublots within that lot.
b.Non Performance Graded (PG) Asphalts. For bitumen of types other than PG asphalts, if both the original and check samples of bitumen fail to meet the same testing requirement of the relevant specifications, except penetration and demulsibility, and the Engineer determines that the deviation will not materially affect the quality of the work, the Department will reduce payment for the bitumen by 20 percent of the invoice price (FOB refinery) per unit, for the quantity of bitumen represented by the failing samples. If both the original and check samples fail to meet two or more of the same testing requirements of the rel evant specifications, including penetration and demulsibility, and the Engineer determines the deviation will not materially affect the quality of the work, the Engineer will base the price adjustment on the highest unit price reduction.
1.Penetration. If the test results of both the original and check samples of the bitumen fail to meet the penetration testing requirements of the relevant specifications, the Engineer will reduce payment for the bitumen by applying a unit price reduction factor to the invoice price (FOB refinery) of the bitumen. The Engineer will average the variation of penetration percentages of both failing samples and determine the unit price reduction factor in accordance with Table 109-01: Table 109 -01 Unit Price Reduction Factor per Variation of Penetration Variation of Penetration Adjustment Factor 0.1–5 % 5 % >5–10 % 10 % >10–15 % 25 % >15 % 50 % The contract price adjustment will be determined by multiplying the Adjustment Factor by the total tons of bitumen represented by the test and the invoice price 105 for the bitumen. The contract price adjustment will be applied under the appropriate bitumen item.
2.Demulsibility. If the test results of both the original and check samples of the emulsified bitumen fail to meet the demulsibility testing requirements of the relevant specifications, the Engineer will reduce payment for the bitumen by applying a unit price reduction factor to the invoice price (FOB refinery) of the bitumen. The Engineer will average the variation of demulsibility percentages of both failing samples and determine the unit price reduction factor in accordance with the following: Adjustment Factor (%) = Average Variation from Specified Value × 0.67